|
|
|
FRONT PAGE
Engineers
leave with many questions unanswered
By
Meg Olson
Point Roberts
water district engineers came to Point Roberts to present property
owners and residents with the tip of the sewer iceberg but the
almost 80 people in the audience at the September 10 meeting werent
satisfied. They wanted to know what was under the surface.
I thought I was coming here for concrete information,
said one audience member. How will this affect me? What
will it cost? Engineers Bob Bergstrom and David Nitchals
did not come with answers but with questions of their own. We
need to look at how much wastewater is generated, how much is
generated, how do we get it to where we treat it, how do we treat
it and how do we get rid of it, Nitchals said. Its
all up to you.
The water district is paying for the new sewer comprehensive plan,
the last version of which came out in 1991, with help from an
80 percent grant from the U.S. forest service which was secured
by the infrastructure task force of the Point Roberts Economic
Development Committee. This is as far as weve committed
to go, said water district commissioner Tom Prescott. Whether
we take the next step or not is not something well answer
today.
Nitchals and Bergstrom presented a number of options they would
consider as they drafted a sewer comprehensive plan for the Point.
Two collection systems are being looked at. A conventional gravity
feed system would be more expensive to build, but ongoing maintenance
would be less. The other option would involve using smaller pipe
and a grinder pump at every home to pressurize the system.
What happens if the power goes out? was the question
from the audience. Representing pump unit distributor Correct
Equipment, Howard Taub said that without power the pumps would
not work but that didnt mean you couldnt use the toilet.
The pump units also incorporate large storage tanks and an overflow
onto the ground if they fill up. The pumps, which cost $3,500
to $4,000 installed, could either be the responsibility of the
homeowner or of the district, rolled in as part of the system
cost. Taub said the units required minimal maintenance. Typically
you put them in the ground and dont see it for at least
nine years,he said.
There is a long list of possibilities for treating and disposing
of the wastewater, from a treatment plant on the Point to sending
it to Delta for treatment. Nitchals said there was such an arrangement
between Abbotsford and Sumas. They had a long two-year process
but the precedent has been set, he said. So far Delta had
not appeared receptive to such a solution. Theyre
not returning our calls, Nitchals said. Nitchals and Bergstrom
said they had some guidelines to follow in determining which areas
should be sewered, but wanted more feedback from the community.
If theres a group that wants a particular area sewered
thats something we can focus on, Nitchals said. The
system will have to work around numerous wetlands and zoning restrictions
on sewers for rural areas, which accounts for many of Point Roberts
larger parcels.
Nitchals said environmental or development seemed to be the primary
reasons proponents of the sewer felt it was needed. If someone
has a long narrow lot he may not have enough land to build a house
and leave enough room for a drainfield, he said.
According to a map presented by engineers, of 23 septic failures
on county records for the Point, five are on Gulf Road, four in
Maple Beach and four in the Shady Glen subdivision. Several audience
members said the primary need for sewer was in the central business
district. It cost me $40,000 to put in the septic for the
restaurant, said Brewsters owner Joan Roberts. Id
much rather see that go into a community system.
Our mandate is to look at microsystems and look at a global
system, Bergstrom said. We have all these different
service levels to look at, including doing nothing.
Doing nothing is precisely what many members of the audience had
in mind. Theres a terrific organization trying to
push sewer on you a very well connected operation that
wants the taxpayer to buy them a sewer, said Roger Gates
to the audience. We moved to Point Roberts for eagles and
bunnies, agreed Lynn Pyles. The minute you bring in
sewers the whole area will turn into another Tsawwassen.
Mr. Gates is entitled to his opinion and his open spaces
but right now someone else is paying for them, said airport
owner Robin Lamb. If we want the land for green spaces we
should get together a group and buy it from people who have invested
their money in it, said Ann Christi.
Local developer Shawn Hodgins of Century Holdings acknowledged
a sewer for all of Point Roberts would in a minor way subsidize
bigger development. There may be a little bit of truth to
that, he said. Sewer would not be a determining factor
for us to go ahead with the development but it might save us $100,000.
Hodgins said they are considering a small resort development across
from the golf course. Construction has stopped on another partially
completed off Johnson Road. As those properties develop, he said,
if there is no sewer they would build independent community systems.
Well be putting hundreds of thousands or millions
of dollars into a system that could better go into a community
system.
Environmental concerns due to the potential for leaky septics
many in the audience to support for the sewer. The county
health department doesnt hear about one tenth of the septic
problems here, said Hank Peltier, who as the founder of
Hanks Backhoe Service built many of the Points drainfields.
Some have wooden boxes and they flush right out to Boundary
Bay with the tide.
If septics are a health problem we need to do something,
but are they? said Val Stewart. Are the waters showing
contamination? We should be testing that first. Kent Craig,
representing the Maple Beach Property Owners Associations
171 members said they were adamantly opposed to sewers. If
someone doesnt have a proper septic system we should be
concerned about it but a good working system is far better than
collecting it all in one place. Soils are the best filter there
are, he said.
The bottom line, said Arthur Wilkowski, was that there wasnt
enough information for anyone in the community to make an informed
decision. I want to decide based on concrete information,
he said. Other audience members said that how much the system
would cost and how it would be split up was the most important
question.
Options include a bond issue put to voters, a local improvement
district in which property owners are assessed based on the cost
of getting them the system, federal and state grants and loans,
or a combination of the three.
Another sewer planning meeting has been scheduled for October
30 at the fire station on Benson Road at 7 p.m. The meeting will
review service options and construction and operation costs...
BACK
TO TOP
|