| FRONT
PAGE
Parks pursuing
priorities for recreation
Whatcom
County parks and recreation director Michael McFarlane was
on the Point last month for a public workshop on parks and
recreation priorities in Point Roberts, to be included in a
revised comprehensive plan for the county.
“In
the next 20 years the population of the county is expected
to double and that will put a tremendous strain on our open
space and facilities,” he said at the January 25 meeting
at the community center. “What are the priorities?”
Preserving
Lily Point came out as a strong priority for most of the
two-dozen people who attended the workshop, for reasons ranging
from shoreline protection to public recreation opportunities. “We’re
looking at multiple benefits from sites for parks,” McFarlane
acknowledged. Lily Point came up in discussing forested lands
that warranted protection, shoreline access, wildlife habitat
preservation, recreational amenities and trail systems. It
was cited as culturally important both as a native American
heritage site and as part of the area’s fisheries history. “That’s
going to rank fairly high,” McFarlane acknowledged.
Those
attending the workshop wondered if it was appropriate for
the county to include land they didn’t own in their
planning documents. “We need to think of the big
picture, not what we have today but what might happen if
something became available,” he
said. He added inclusion in the plan was critical to accessing
many government funding sources.
Workshop
participants looked at the big picture of parks and recreation
facilities in the county in over a dozen categories and talked
about what the Point had, and could use, that would fit into
the plan.
“One
of the areas the plan will be looking at is our agricultural
lands and farmlands,” McFarlane
said, in an effort to balance further urbanization
with a protection of the county’s
rural character. George Wright suggested some of the
old apple orchards on the Point had both cultural and
biological importance as heritage gene stock.
Parks
board and historical society member Irene Waters said the
historical society had lists of historical homes and farms
which could be used to target potential properties to preserve
as heritage sites, and added the historical society continued
to try and acquire one of these properties as a museum. McFarlane
said the cemetery might also be listed as a heritage site in
the plan.
In discussing
recreational amenities chamber of commerce member Terrie Laporte
stopped in to point out that two local projects still in the
planning stages, a pier at the foot of Gulf Road and the plan
for a lighthouse or replica at Lighthouse Marine Park needed
to be listed in the plan.
Many workshop
participants wanted to see access to the water improved. While
most of the beaches and tidelands on the Point are privately
owned, the state constitution protects the public’s
right to use navigable waters and in many legal
opinions that extends to use of the lands between the high
and low tide marks even when the tide is out, even on privately
owned tidelands. However, without upland access there is
no way for the public to get to these public resources.
Specifically,
workshop participants wanted a good inventory of access
points and clarification of how the public can get to the public
access beach between the marina and Oceanside condominiums.
Trails
were also a priority for workshop participants, and Lighthouse
Park manager Ben VanBuskirk presented a locally developed
plan for a system of multi-use trails, such as the new trail
connecting the marina to Lighthouse Park. “We can take
that local plan and roll it into our plan,” McFarlane
said. Wright also asked that some of the
Point’s
more informal trails be catalogued. “Even
though it may be on private lands now if
the opportunity comes up for funding to acquire
the easement then it’s in the plan,” Wright
said.
Scenic roads
will also be part of the county’s comprehensive
plan and Waters suggested, “The whole
outside of Point Roberts is a scenic route,” and
it was appropriate to take measures to
protect the stands of trees lining local
arterials.
Expanding
the existing community center or building another facility
was also discussed. “We’ve already
identified the need for a community center
here,” McFarlane said. “The
next thing we need is for something indicating
the scope of what is being asked.” Wright
said he envisioned a multi-use center
that would have fewer restrictions than
the current community center, such as
allowing alcohol at a wedding reception
with proper permitting.
An open
house is scheduled at the community center
March 1 from 6 to 8 p.m. to share with
a wider audience some of the priorities identified
during the workshop and get public input prior
to their inclusion in the new version of the
county parks and recreation plan.
|