|
INSIDE
New border
initiatives implemented
By Meg
Olson
In the last
week the Department of Homeland Security flipped the switch
on two new uses of technology intended to improve security
without slowing traffic at the border. In one case the only
noticeable traffic was a clog of television crews at the Pacific
Highway port of entry filming the first visitor fingerprinted
entering the United States rather than being asked to fill
out a green form. In the other case trucks had two or longer
hour waits as they headed south across the border.
US VISIT
On December 9 the US VISIT program was officially in place
at the nations 50 largest land ports of entry, which include
all those in Whatcom County. Agency officials stressed in
unison that the new program was not going to slow down travelers,
but had a chance to speed them up. “What they’ve found
since it started in Port Huron is it’s taken less time
than the paper process,” said Blaine port director
Margaret Fearon. “People don’t have to fill out
forms, make mistakes, go back.” Customs and Border
Protection public information officer Mike Milne said average
processing time for US VISIT was six to eight minutes per
traveler, as opposed to it predecessor which took 11 to 12
minutes. In 2004 the five Whatcom County crossings saw nine
million travelers. Fearon said 1.5 percent or 140,000 of
those would have needed to register with US VISIT, underlining
the small impact of the program.
In Point
Roberts the numbers are lower, with 0.24 percent of the port’s
1.9 million entries needing an I-94 4,435 in 2004. Milne said
inspectors at the Point were seeing six to seven US VISIT travelers
a day and so far “it’s been smooth
sailing without a single hitch.”
The US VISIT
program replaces the paper I-94 record of arrival and departure
with a computerized system that takes two fingerprints
from all foreign visitors, except most Canadians who
are currently exempt. “It affects basically all the world
except for U.S. and Canadian citizens,” said P.T.
Wright, national executive director for the program.
The computerized record also contains information swiped
from the visitor’s passport
and a photograph, all of which is compared to the US
VISIT database made up of information from a variety
of federal, local and international law enforcement databases.
Kent
Lewis with the US VISIT team sent from Washington D.C.
for the event said the new system was “enhancing
security and facilitating travel. It’s an extremely
valuable tool.”
Critics
of the system are concerned with how the system will evolve. “Visualize
a border where everyone who is not a U.S. citizen has
to park, go in, get fingerprinted and get back in
their car,” Bellingham immigration attorney Greg Boos
told a cross-border business conference in Bellingham
hosted by the Pacific Corridor Enterprise Council
December 8. While the system currently exempts most Canadians
the 9/11 commission recommends that in time everyone,
including Americans and Canadians, be part of a biometric
system “enabling their identities
to be securely verified when they enter the United
States.” Wright
said there were “no plans at this time to have
US VISIT expand out.”
There are
also questions about how much of a security benefit is realized
using a two-print system. A report to the U.S.
General Accounting Office and to Congress by the National
Institutes of Standards and Technology (NIST) made
the distinction between using the prints for verification – linking
a person to the prints collected from them – and
identification – seeing
if those prints match any in other systems and
law enforcement databases. While they recommend
the two prints and a picture system for verification,
they concluded it was insufficient for identification
as “the image quality of most archival law
enforcement databases is lower than the image quality
of the data presently being collected by US VISIT
and will remain so for some time into the future.” This
lowers the accuracy of the system from 96 percent
for verification to 53 percent for identification
under those conditions. Effectively, the system
is highly accurate at determining if the person
at the counter is the same person who entered the
United States a week ago, but it has half a chance
of matching them to an arrest in Germany in the
80s for bomb-making. NIST recommends using a ten-print
system for that purpose.
“How
much space will it take to do it right? How much will it cost?” Boos
wanted to know. US VISIT public information officer
Kim Weisman said $380 million dollars was spent
on the program in 2003 and $340 million in both
2004 and 2005. Similar funding is anticipated
through 2010
Boos also
asked why the system was being rolled out when there was no
way to collect exit information. Wright said that while “technically,
officially there is an exit portion,” to
the US VISIT process as there was to the I-94
process, there is no official pathway for travelers
to report their exit at land borders. “Beginning
next summer we’ll start testing to see
if we can develop an exit solution so people
can exit at current speed to meet our mandate
of not impacting legitimate trade and travel,” he
said, suggesting a radio frequency card similar
to a NEXUS card could be used.
Truck Registration
The Automated Commercial Environ-ment (ACE)
pilot program at Pacific Highway started up
at midnight Saturday December 11 to little
fanfare and long south bound truck lines that
continued into the week. Milne said delays
were temporary and would ease as inspectors
learned the new system and technological bugs were
worked out. “We have 50 technicians working on it now,” he
said.
Under the
new system trucks submit their manifests electronically prior
to arrival. “We have these
systems already in place for ships,” he said. “We
have it for air cargo and people, and we’re bringing it
up on rail.”
Since November 15 all carriers have needed
to have arrival information at the border an
hour before arrival, said acting port director
Jay Brandt, and most do so through an entry
from a broker. “That’s
the interim measure until or when an electronic
manifest becomes required,” he said. He said currently only 60 carriers
were equipped to send electronic manifests
to the border, but that the system was intended to eventually apply to all shippers. “There’s
one law driving the requirement for advanced
information,” he
said.
Milne said
once the bugs are out the system could make waits for truckers
shorter because it will give inspectors time to do any background
checks on truck, driver and goods in transit
prior to the truck’s arrival at the border. “If they
do it in advance we can determine if we
want to take a close look,” he said. “This is a security measure.
Hopefully it will increase our security but if we can identify those high
risk shipments maybe the low risk stuff
can go down the road faster.”
|