ARCHIVES

This Issue Main Page

Main Archive
Page

Editor Letters

Sheriffs Report


Letter Policy

 

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

The Editor:
It has been said it takes a village to raise a child, well I have learned it takes a community to build a home. As my wife Maria and I prepare to move into our new home I would like to take this opportunity to thank the many good folks here at the Point who made it possible. You know who you are, so it is not necessary to use last names. First the realtors, Jerry, Jim, Maureen and John, who were key in helping us move our other three properties and get the new lots which gave us the cash to build.
Next I want to thank Bill, Brian and Ron who did the clearing and hauling away the trees on the new lots as well as doing the site work for the foundation. Then there was the hardworking concrete crew – Peter, Elliot, Maddog, Alberto and others who put in the septic and did our foundation, floors, etc. The framers – Laird, Robbie and Lee did a great job to top things off. For the roof and siding, we are indebted to Al and Terry. The drywall crew of Dan and gang were super. For the plumbing, we must thank Mark and son.
For all things electrical and appliances we owe a special thanks to Gordie and Kathy for their kindness, friendship and cheerful service. From our neighbors in Blaine, I must give a big thank you to Jerry for getting us warm and cozy. Judd deserves mention for his help in painting the hard-to-get-to places. Not to be overlooked are Lorne, Bud, George, Carrington and the rest of the gang at the hardware store for our lumber package and always being cheerful and responsive to many purchases.
For getting us online and talking, thanks go out to Brent, Jim, Kelly and Deb. The ladies at the bank – Carrie, Darlene and all – were always cheerful and helpful when I needed their services. Thanks go to Steve for showing up as he heard I needed gutters. For all things to do with tile and stone, we must give a special thanks to the other Steve for a house that looks great both inside and out. Thanks go out to Kevin for prompt deliveries on items we needed from north of the 49th. Last, but not least, we must thank Shane for putting the finishing touches to all.
If I have overlooked someone the fault is mine but you know who you are and we are thankful to all for your advice (Jeff comes to mind) and encouragement. So from this old soldier and his bride, we owe you all a big thanks and well done Point Roberts.
Andy & Maria Anderson
Point Roberts

The Editor:
Boards of commissioners of water districts are created and endowed with extensive powers under section 57 of the Revised Code of Washington. Commissioners of Point Roberts Water District #4 are responsible to use these powers in the interest of all the residents of the district. This responsibility cannot be delegated. These are their duties.
Among these powers, paragraph (3), section 57.08.005 deals with supplying water. “To construct condemn and purchase, add to, maintain, and supply waterworks to furnish the district and the inhabitants thereof and any other persons, both within and without the district, with an ample supply of water for all uses and purposes public and private with full authority to regulate and control the use, contents, distribution, and price thereof.”
Past boards have known for years that they were approaching the limits of the supply of the Greater Vancouver Water District (GVWD) contract yet took no direct action and only recently tried to delegate the responsibility to the district manager to request more water from the GVWD, as well as approach the Department of Ecology (DOE) for a larger allocation of connections. They should have written the GVWD directly under the commission’s signature requesting reopening the contract to increase the supply and at the same time, schedule a meeting with the DOE.
As elected officials, commissioners have the authority to get the attention of the DOE staff if they present a rational plan to increase the water supply. The plan should show that they can manage and have the power to control the water usage on a daily basis so that the daily use will not exceed the contract limit and at the same time, meet the state requirement of maintaining a maximum daily demand of 350 gpd per equivalent residential unit (ERU), see WAC 246-290-221. This would increase the available connections by about 400. These additional connections would buy the time required to develop existing brackish water sources using a reverse osmosis packaged water treatment plant. Such plants produce high quality water at less cost including capital cost than paid for Vancouver water. Such sources have the potential of increasing the potable water supply by at least 50 percent.
When the members of a board sign vouchers for payment and sign the annual budget, they are more than authorizing payment and the forthcoming year’s expenditures, they are stating that they know how the expenditures are covered by the water rates charged.
There are two costs in particular that should be followed closely:
Cost of water per 100 cubic feet since this is the basic on which water is sold. This includes the purchase price of water and all other costs incurred before the water enters the distribution mains, i.e. all costs within treatment facility including capital cost; and cost of distribution. This includes meter reading, system maintenance, office costs, etc.
Essentially, the cost of water and cost of distribution are two cost centers that should be programmed for monthly review. This information is critical in establishing equitable water rates. For example, the cost of GVWD water for 2004 was $1.56 per 100 cubic feet. To this must be added treatment and other supply costs estimated at least .25 per 100 cubic feet for a total of $1.81 per cubic foot. The rate charge for over 600 cf is $1. This means that those using over 600 cf are being undercharged by .81 per cf.
The commissioners have never established a risk management plan. Recognizing the isolation of the district, such a plan is critical. This district relies on two men, the manager with an able assistant to operate a complicated and widespread vital service. There is no back-up plan. Incidences occur and the response must be immediate. For example, a line break must be isolated within one hour.
A board must establish policies so that the staff can deal with the present while the board plans for the future.
Syd Wallace, commissioner, Point
Roberts Water District #4, 1977 to 1990
Point Roberts

Letters Policy
The All Point Bulletin welcomes letters to the editor; however, the opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the editor. Letters must include name, address and daytime telephone number for verification. Letters must not exceed 450 words and may be edited or rejected for reasons of legality and good taste.
A fresh viewpoint on matters of general interest to local readers will increase the likelihood of publication. Writers should avoid personal invective. Unsigned letters will not be accepted for publication. Requests for withholding names will be considered on an individual basis.
Thank You letters should be limited to ten names.
Only one letter per month from an individual correspondent will be published.

Please send your letter to: P.O. Box 1451, Point Roberts, WA 98281
or fax (360) 945-1613.

E-mail:editor@allpointbulletin.com

 

BACK TO TOP

©2000-2006 All Point Bulletin All Right Reserved

Privacy Statement

Questions or comments about this web site, contact the Webmaster

Web Design & Hosting by
Web Design and Hosting

 

Home Page