|
INSIDE
District
approves new water rates
By
Pat Grubb
Just two
members of the public were on hand to hear water district commissioners
Renée Coe and Madelaine Anderson vote to accept new
water rates and general facility charges at a June 22 special
meeting. It was a far cry from the 40-plus crowd that turned
out to comment on the proposed rates at a public hearing held
three days before at the community center.
Acceptance
of the new rates means the commissioners and district staff
can now turn to deciding how the remaining 160 allowable water
connections will be allocated and thus ending the current years-long
moratorium on water hookups.
Under the
new rates, typical single-family residences will see an increase
in their bill from $40.28 to $46.76 in 2007 to $53.01 in 2008,
or 16.1% and 31.6%, respectively from current rates. Multi-family
residential units (greater than four units) and commercial
users would see an increase from $55 to $78.49 and $124.27
or an increase of 43% and 126%, respectively.
The golf
course will see its basic charge increase from $227.04 to $361.76
in 2007 and $513.54 in 2008, or 59% and 126.18%, respectively.
Increases
would not be limited to 2007 and 2008, however. Depending
upon which capital expenditures actually get built, the consultants
have projected that by 2012 single-family residences, commercial
users and the golf course would increase to a base rate of
$89.50, $209.78 and $866.94, respectively.
The bad
news doesn’t
end there, however. General Facilities Charges (GFC) to
connect to the system have been increased from $1,500 to $5,500,
a 266% increase. The GFCs are levied on new connections
in order to have latecomers pay their share of the existing
as well as a portion of new infrastructure that is required
in order to service the newcomers. In setting the GFC,
the water commissioners adopted what is known as the average
cost method. This method recognizes that existing and future
customers benefit from both existing and future facilities.
It typically results in lower GFCs than would be the
case if all future improvements are borne by future customers.
Under the latter scenario, called the growth pays for growth
option, the GFC was projected to cost $21,390, a figure
that could be expected to significantly dampen growth in Point
Roberts. Under the adopted GFC, both current and future
users are expected to pay for future improvements of the system,
whether current users benefit from them or not.
This was
clearly one concern of audience members at the Tuesday, June
19 meeting at the community center, especially from seasonal
residents who were concerned with current monthly charges. “We
don’t use much water,” said one man, “It’s
cheaper at home. The minimum charge is getting
out of hand. As Canadians, we have no say.”
Tom
Miller urged the board to consider other means
to augment the water supply. “I think we
need to start thinking outside the box,” pointing
out that there are already predictions of water
shortages in the greater Vancouver region (the
source of Point Roberts water). The audience
enthuiastically applauded Miller’s assertion
that Texas-style home cisterns could provide
partial solution to the Point’s water woes.
Former water
district commissioner Syd Wallace asserted the proposed 3 million
gallon water reservoir is of limited value because the district
would be unable to recharge it during the summer. “There’s
no consideration of conservation,” she said.
Given
the financial stakes involved, the crowd was
remarkably well-behaved by Point Roberts standards if one
discounts Steven Sweetwood’s somewhat vague
statement that “Corruption
in Point Roberts is like hockey in Canada.” That
brought a stern rebuke from district attorney
John Milne who, incredulous, asked Sweetwood
if he was suggesting the board was corrupt and
told him his statement was “completely
out of order and inappropriate.”
The new
charges and rates are intended to pay for a
new three million gallon reservoir (part of those
costs may be borne by developers), expected
increases in water supply costs, 35 miles of water main
replacements, new remote meter reading equipment,
enhanced fire flow capacity and possible new
office and storage facilities.
|