INS kicks off review of NEXUS program
By Meg Olson
The Immigration and Naturalization Service is giving NEXUS its 60-day check up and considering an overhaul on policies and hours of operation. Were reviewing all kinds of things, said Bob Okin, deputy director for the Seattle district. We want to ensure the program is as effective as we want it to be.
Okin said they would start their review with the application process how long applications are taking to process, how consistent the application processing time is, and how consistent and efficient interviews are.
Hours of operation will also get the once over. Theyre analyzing usage numbers now, trying to find out when the lanes are used the most and how to best allocate staffing, said Seattle district public information officer Garrison Courtney. He said usage figures for the program were not publicly available at this time.
They will also review denials and why people are being turned down for the program, Okin said.
There are now 8,245 people approved for NEXUS and 32,000 applications have been received, according to Courtney. Just over 250 applicants to the NEXUS system have been denied so far, for reasons ranging from previous criminal convictions to houseplants in the PACE lane. Stories are plentiful of long forgotten run-ins with the law or produce under the seat that had not jeopardized PACE membership cropping up during a NEXUS interview.
A Ladner resident lost her PACE privileges because she had forgotten she had a bottle of wine in her trunk, but was reinstated to the program. However, she was denied NEXUS and told it was because of a customs violation. I asked if I could appeal it and they said absolutely no, she said. A Point Roberts resident was turned down because an onion had been found in the wheel well of her truck, leading to a PACE warning but not loss of PACE privileges. On the other hand, one applicant who has been approved for the program had a warning in the PACE program for a lemon.
There doesnt seem to be any consistency, said Point Roberts marina manager David Gellatly. I have a pile of applications here and very few people are taking it because theres a growing sense of paranoia. There are very few people in the world who dont have a little skeleton in their closet.
In some cases NEXUS applicants who have crossed the border for years have found themselves not only denied NEXUS but admission to the U.S. or Canada. One Point Roberts resident and frequent border-crosser found himself stranded in Blaine after the inspector interviewing him found he had a 17-year-old conviction for reckless driving. He was denied NEXUS and admission to Canada. He was unable to return home until later that night after his wife brought down $200 for Canada Immigration to issue a certificate of rehabilitation.
Point Roberts attorney Tom Prescott is getting extra business thanks to worries about NEXUS. Ive been approached by people about getting pardons or records expunged. They want to clean things up before they apply. Prescott himself was denied NEXUS, and he was surprised. I had a run in with a border guard a few years ago, he said. Prescotts PACE privileges were revoked after he drove away from the inspection booth before instructed to do so by the inspector, incorrectly assuming he was free to go. He filed a suit in Canadian federal court and settled with Canada Customs to have the infraction removed, or so he thought. While he was accepted when he reapplied to PACE, the infraction came up again in his NEXUS interview. I was a little miffed. Now I have to go back to court and this time get an order, he said.
Courtney said that, with a three-percent rejection rate the number of denials was within an acceptable range. This is a four agency program and all four agencies rules apply, all the agencies need to agree, he said. Courtney said he did not know the rejection rate for the PACE program but estimated it was lower than the rate of NEXUS rejection, due to tighter standards and more in-depth information checks. One of the significant things not like the PACE program is drunk driving convictions, which are a problem for Canada. People need to comply fully with the laws of both countries, he said.
Some questions have been raised about what level of stringency actually has an impact on national security. There needs to be some sort of statute of limitations, said Point Roberts resident Ruby White. They shouldnt go back all the way to when baby-boomers were raising hell. A lot of them grew up to be good, respectable people. White also felt that the zero tolerance policy, under which NEXUS participants lose their privileges after one violation of program or general agency rules, was appropriate for serious infractions but not for an onion that fell out of a grocery bag. Thats just bureaucratic pettiness, she said.
The current review underway is an INS review of the entire process as it relates to INS function and but Courtney said the information could be used by other agencies. If we find things that can be improved on well share that, he said.
In other INS news, staffing increases at Point Roberts in the last month, though they may not be permanent, have alleviated monster lines that marked the first weekend in August when the backups into Canada were observed trickling as far back as the 8th Avenue White Spot. However, Courtney said that, under a new INS policy they can not release exact staffing numbers. Around September 11 especially thats very sensitive information, he said. He confirmed a new permanent port director was expected for the Point but would not release any further information..