Town hall on curbside trash program draws small crowd

Posted

The first of two town halls organized by the Point Roberts Community Advisory Committee (PRCAC) to discuss the curbside trash pickup system engendered scant interest by the broader community as only 17 people attended in person or on Zoom, five of whom were PRCAC board members or media. The meeting was held at the Gulf Road community center on Sunday, October 16; the next one will be held in the community center on Saturday, October 22 at 4 p.m.

The point of the town halls was to discuss the current curbside trash program as the contract between Whatcom County and the provider, Cando Recycling and Disposal, is coming up for renewal. The current term ends on December 31, 2022; the original contract has been extended four times since the original contract was signed in 2018. The town halls were scheduled during PRCAC’s regular meeting in September.

During that meeting, PRCAC chair Alli Calder read an email from county environmental specialist Jennifer Hayden who advised the committee that the health department would not be sending a representative to the meetings. Hayden wrote, “I shall not be available to attend a townhall meeting. The solid waste system that was implemented to serve Point Roberts followed two years of public process including county council’s decision. The county is committed to support the system which provides a high level of service to residents at a relatively low cost.” Calder had expressed surprise, saying it was strange given that it was the county which suggested gathering input.

Calder was asked at the beginning of the town hall meeting who in the county had requested input from the community or the committee regarding the curbside program. She replied that it had been requested by county executive Satpal Sidhu who had forwarded a complaint letter he had received from a local resident who had complained about the green waste program that was held in the summer. The complaint was lodged by Heidi Baxter, an outspoken opponent of the current system and called upon the county to cancel the contract with Cando, asserting that the company had failed to live up to the contract. Sidhu had forwarded Baxter’s complaint with a one-sentence email:

“Allison

Please share this PRCAC for discussion in your future meetings. Thanks.”

Calder said the committee had discussed the email “and decided that based on Satpal’s request to discuss it, the best way to discuss it was to actually do outreach to the community to find out what the community wants.” Other than the one complaint email, Calder said PRCAC had only received one other email regarding the curbside program and that one was generally in favor of the program but suggested some improvements that needed to be made.

Whatever input is generated by the town hall meetings, it’s not clear what use it will be given that neither the health department or the county executive is interested in reviewing the program. The executive’s spokesperson, Jed Holmes, was asked by the All Point Bulletin if the executive had requested a community review of the curbside program. In a reply dated October 14, Holmes wrote:

“To respond to your question about whether the county requested special meetings about garbage collection, the answer is no, it did not. There is no plan to have any special, extraordinary review of the Cando contract.

This spring the county health department did team up with Cando Recycling and Disposal to temporarily offer free green waste disposal for residents and property owners in the community due to the extraordinary circumstances of the situation as long-absent property owners returned to Point Roberts. That was a one-time arrangement, and something agreed upon by Cando and the county.

Executive Sidhu sometimes makes reference to the lengthy discussions surrounding the county’s approval of the Cando contract as an example of the challenges reaching consensus among Point Roberts residents. However, such references should not misconstrued as an invitation to start an effort to engage in a special review of the contract ahead of the ordinary schedule for contract review and renewal.”

Calder had mentioned at the start of the meeting that people tended to fall into one of three camps; those in favor of the current system, those who wanted to see improvements to the system and those who were fully opposed to it. That became crystal clear as attendees began to talk. First to speak was permanent resident Dee Gough who said she fully supported Cando and felt no sympathy with people who were upset with the green waste program. “You shouldn’t have that much green waste if you had taken care of your property during the pandemic.” Pat Harper also expressed support for the current system. Brian Miller spoke against the program, saying he’s lived in Point Roberts for almost 30 years. Prior to the system being implemented in 2018, he used to self-haul to the transfer station. “Since that system has been in place, I’ve dumped less than six cans of garbage so these cans are costing me about $100 a can.” He called for a referendum to ask people if they want the program and said everyone he’s spoken to is against the system.

Gough later addressed his comments objecting to people claiming to represent the community, asking if the community is against the system, why aren’t they here?

Louise Cassidy said, “What I’m hearing from people is they want a community-based service,” adding composting would be welcome. Samantha Scholefield admitted, “I’m probably known as one of the anti-garbage people” and called for lowering the service level from 26 cans to 12 cans annually. “If we set the minimum high, we are not incentivizing the people to reduce their garbage. We have to do better.” Susie Black, attending by Zoom, would like to have a portion of the 26 cans be able to take to the dump without charge.

The second town hall is scheduled for Saturday, October 22 at 4 p.m. at the Gulf Road community center (Zoom link: bit.ly/3CxWNA8).

Comments

1 comment on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here

  • ArthurReber

    For those who want a reduced minimum, two points. First, everyone pays for services they do not use or use only sparingly. Those without children are paying for the schools. Those who do not drive are paying for road construction and maintenance. Those who are part-timers here are paying for garbage pickup in their primary city or town even though they are not using the services while here. These kinds of circumstances are inevitable in any society that seeks to have effective public services.

    Second, lowering the service level would jeopardize Cando's (or any other contractor's) ability to run a successful business that has a reasonable income stream. This issue was worked out when the initial contract was put forward.

    I am in favor of the current situation and support the county's intention to continue it.

    Arthur Reber, ex-Chair PRCAC

    Thursday, October 20, 2022 Report this


OUR PUBLICATIONS